Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael's avatar

There is this mix of self-improvement/spiritual practices, science fiction fandom, cults, and then against all odds being on the actual cutting edge of applied science. Surprisingly, this is pretty old and keeps repeating itself.

For example the story of Jack Parsons, greatest of rocket scientists, early SF fan, and founder of JPL with some of his other SF fan friends, who also did magickal rituals in a polyamorous group house that at a certain point spun into a destructive quasi-cult.

During the earliest years, before truly ramping up the high-control aspects, L. Ron Hubbard (former ties with Parsons) and Dianetics had a friendly reception with a number of legitimate scientists. There is a friendly letter from Claude Shannon (working at Bell Labs when it was the center of the universe) introducing Hubbard (who he met through science fiction luminary John Campbell) to Warren McCullough.

I think most of the factors laid out in your article probably apply to these cases as well as to the rationalists, but it's an oddly specific thing that keeps happening over the decades.

Expand full comment
Kayla's avatar

I liked this line: There is no conflict so small that five hours straight of emotional processing can’t make it feel both profoundly important and profoundly unsolvable.

The phenomenon of everything seeming Incredibly Important matches my experience. It’s important to cult dynamics that everyone feel guilty at all times, even if your sin is much closer to not doing the dishes than to murder

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts