Last year I ran this post about effective altruism funds. As I wrote in that post: I’m using “fund” as a bit of a term of art here. A “fund” is when you donate to a specific grantmaker, and they donate the money as they see fit. Grantmakers specialize in charity evaluation, so they’re more likely to know about new exciting opportunities, to know which charities are unexpectedly poorly or skillfully run, and to be able to assess complex data about which interventions are best.
Giving What We Can also has its own funds now (one each for global poverty, animal welfare, and longtermism), but they actually say in advance which orgs they're going to regrant those funds to, so this is more like "a convenient way to defer to GWWC's recommendations as explained in the above reviews" than the "give experts more flexibility" model of the other funds.
The Longtermism Fund is now called the Emerging Challenges Fund.
Perhaps the most important new development is Giving What We Can's reviews of several funds, which people considering donating to said funds should probably take a look at: https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/en-US/why-and-how-gwwc-evaluates-the-evaluators#how-we-chose-which-evaluators-to-investigate-in-2023
Giving What We Can also has its own funds now (one each for global poverty, animal welfare, and longtermism), but they actually say in advance which orgs they're going to regrant those funds to, so this is more like "a convenient way to defer to GWWC's recommendations as explained in the above reviews" than the "give experts more flexibility" model of the other funds.
The Longtermism Fund is now called the Emerging Challenges Fund.
Longview also now has a Nuclear Weapons Policy Fund: https://www.longview.org/fund/nuclear-weapons-policy-fund/
Giving Green now has their own fund: https://www.givinggreen.earth/give
The Life You Can Save has seven different funds: https://www.thelifeyoucansave.org/cause-funds/
There's also some stuff about tax deductions but it's more boring so I'm relegating it to a separate comment.