Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Timothy M.'s avatar

One of the wild things about Vietnam ending the Cambodian genocide was that the United States, on the batshit presumption that enemies of Vietnam automatically deserved their support, kept insisting that the Khmer Rouge and their allies were the rightful leaders of Cambodia from 1979 (when Vietnam invaded) until 1993.

Expand full comment
Anonymous Dude's avatar

Why do you get so many deaths fighting Maoism?

1a. If you're on the left, you can blame colonialism. A lot of these were anticolonial wars and the disruption of the underlying order and colonial brutalities meant the anti-Maoist faction was willing to kill lots of people.

1b. Or you could blame anticommunism. The West was willing to look the other way (as you've said) as long as you could say you were fighting Communism. I had a whole trading-card deck of anticommunist dictators at one point.

2a. If you're on the right, you can blame the lack of development of the existing countries; Maoism caught on in the Global South, and they didn't have those pesky ideas about human rights sitting in the background holding them back. Sure the Germans did and it didn't stop the Nazis, but everyone thought they were awful at the time.

2b. Or you could blame the lack of economic development; Maoism focuses on the peasant instead of the urban worker, and as a result is much more popular in unindustrialized countries. It's much easier to get mass deaths when most people are barely above subsistence anyway.

Expand full comment
43 more comments...

No posts