Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sniffnoy's avatar

> If you’re not in fandom: don’t ask.

I mean, you could also say, if you're not in famdom, read this and you'll learn. :P I only had a vague idea what "antis" were... I just saw "antis" referred to a bunch on your Tumblr previously and was confused. Anti-*what*? I remember my initial inference was that it was something related to transgender politics, but eventually I realized my mistake and gathered it was something vaguely like what's described here. But this gives me a better idea!

I really do have to wonder where it started, though...

Expand full comment
Tortie's avatar

Re: carbon offsets by preventing deforestation.

I'm a landscape architect in Maryland, USA and I am very curious about how the REDD+ system will work out. We have had very strict forest conservation regulations for the last ~30 years here (though I personally been doing forest conservation compliance work for the last ~2 years) that are mandated on the state level but implemented on the county level.

One of the ways to meet forest conservation requirements is off-site forest banking. Essentially, instead of meeting forest requirements by retaining/protecting onsite forest or afforesting a certain percentage of the site you're developing, you pay the owner of an offsite forested property to put some of their land in a perpetual conservation easement. Problem is, after only 30 years, there is basically no available forest in the counties I work in that is owned by anyone willing to bank it. Maybe that means there's just not enough remaining forest, or that the incentives aren't big enough, or something. Perhaps a national program, especially in a country with much more remaining forest, wouldn't have this availability problem.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts