Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sarah Eustis-Guthrie's avatar

I love the piece on the Times. I'd seen a lot of very shallow, hyper-partisan anger on both sides about the whole Tom Cotton controversy, but this is the most thoughtful and compelling argument for "the NYT has become overly infused by politics" that I've seen. Thanks for sharing!

Great line: "Our role, we knew, was to help readers understand such threats, and this required empathetic – not sympathetic – reporting. This is not an easy distinction but good reporters make it: they learn to understand and communicate the sources and nature of a toxic ideology without justifying it, much less advocating it."

Expand full comment
Brendan Richardson's avatar

Wait, the CCP hated Babel too? I never thought I'd agree with them on anything!

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts