Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Aaron Gertler's avatar

I wanted to see the British side of the Lucy Letby story, so I looked at the Lucy Letby subreddit. I was expecting fierce debate about the case and the UK justice system. Instead, the atmosphere was eerie: the users (and many of the mods?) all wanted Letby dead and were banning anyone who (roughly) cited arguments from outside the trial.

"We do not permit posts or discussions that run contrary to evidence and outcomes legally accepted, because such sources have not survived cross examination the way that admitted evidence has."

The British consensus seems to be that the New Yorker ignored enormous amounts of anti-Letby evidence. It's not the kind of reaction I'm used to in my own internet spaces, but I'd be curious to see some LessWronger examine both sides the way folks were doing with Amanda Know back in the day, especially to summarize which parts of the prosecution's case were left out of the article.

Expand full comment
SkinShallow's avatar

I've come to the conclusion that ToT link posts are the best link posts among the substacks I follow. I not only click through quite a few of the links but also find really interesting stuff at the other ends. Thank you for compiling those! I realise this is a completely useless comment from the "information or stimulation value" point of view, but I can't think of anything to add to increase that.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts